difference between communism and marxism

House Authors

2 min read

·

11-12-2024

48

0

Share

While often used interchangeably, communism and Marxism are distinct concepts. Marxism provides the theoretical framework, while communism represents its envisioned outcome. Understanding the difference requires examining their historical context, core tenets, and practical applications.

Marxism: The Theory

Marxism, the brainchild of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, is a socio-political theory analyzing the historical development of societies based on class struggle. At its core, Marxism posits that:

• History is driven by class struggle: Society is divided into classes based on their relationship to the means of production (e.g., landowners vs. peasants, capitalists vs. workers). This inherent conflict fuels historical change.
• Capitalism is inherently exploitative: Marx argued that under capitalism, the bourgeoisie (owners of capital) exploit the proletariat (workers) by extracting surplus value—the difference between the value a worker produces and their wages.
• The dictatorship of the proletariat: To overcome capitalist exploitation, Marx envisioned a transitional phase where the working class seizes control of the means of production, establishing a "dictatorship of the proletariat." This isn't a totalitarian dictatorship but rather a system where the working class governs in its own interests.
• The eventual withering away of the state: After a period of proletarian rule and the elimination of class distinctions, the state—seen as an instrument of class oppression—would eventually become unnecessary and "wither away," leading to a communist society.

Key Marxist Concepts:

• Historical Materialism: This approach analyzes history through the lens of material conditions and economic structures, rather than ideas or cultural factors.
• Alienation: Under capitalism, workers are alienated from their labor, the products they produce, their fellow workers, and themselves.
• Class Consciousness: Workers must develop an awareness of their shared exploitation and their collective power to overthrow the capitalist system.

Communism: The Goal

Communism, as envisioned by Marx, is the final stage of societal development—a classless, stateless society characterized by:

• Common Ownership of the Means of Production: Resources and property are collectively owned and controlled, eliminating private ownership and the resulting inequalities.
• Abolition of Private Property: This doesn't necessarily mean the abolition of personal possessions, but rather the elimination of private ownership of the means of production that allows for exploitation.
• Distribution Based on Need: Goods and services are distributed based on the needs of individuals, rather than their ability to pay, fostering equality and eliminating scarcity.
• Absence of Class Struggle: With the elimination of class distinctions, the inherent conflict driving historical change disappears.

The Difference in Practice

The crucial distinction lies in their application. Marxism is a theoretical framework for understanding societal development and revolution, while communism is the desired end-state. Many attempts to establish communist societies have deviated significantly from Marx's original vision. For example:

• Leninist Interpretation: Vladimir Lenin adapted Marxist theory to the conditions of Russia, leading to a highly centralized, authoritarian state, far from the stateless society Marx envisioned.
• Stalinism and Maoism: These interpretations emphasized totalitarian control, state-planned economies, and widespread suppression of dissent, bearing little resemblance to Marx's concept of a withering state.

Conclusion

Marxism provides the theoretical foundation for understanding historical change and the critique of capitalism, while communism represents the ultimate goal—a classless, stateless society. However, historical attempts to achieve communism have often resulted in authoritarian regimes, highlighting the complexities of translating a sophisticated theoretical framework into practical political realities. The distinction is crucial for understanding both the intellectual legacy of Marxism and the diverse interpretations of communism throughout history.